Well the result of your belief seems to be identical to mine.
You misinterpret the actions of failed human to be the actions of a person attempting to follow Christs example. A result of an anti-Christ like stance is what you seem to conclude the same as me.
If you want to call it 'a fine act of nature', then of course I'd disagree. Nature as a whole 'just is'. It's nondiscriminatory. A pure actuality, which is what you're accusing of being 'evil', cannot be so given it's nature. Make your mind up whether you want to discuss it or not k?
You misinterpret the actions of failed human to be the actions of a person attempting to follow Christs example. A result of an anti-Christ like stance is what you seem to conclude the same as me.
If you want to call it 'a fine act of nature', then of course I'd disagree. Nature as a whole 'just is'. It's nondiscriminatory. A pure actuality, which is what you're accusing of being 'evil', cannot be so given it's nature. Make your mind up whether you want to discuss it or not k?
