[split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action

[Shell B]

Didn't get the Mehmet thread reference I take it? No-one got that? No?

Oh, I'm sorry. You mean the thread that I was not involved in in an official capacity, but in which I presented my opinion about the schoolyard behavior you and others were engaging in? That thread?

Would you care to take me step by step through what aided your decision in ignoring the constant attempts of one person to force arguements on whos the better nation and/or race on as many threads as he could in a forum concerned with matters of theism and atheism?

In what world am I the only staff member here? Firstly, I ignore none of the issues that anyone presents to the staff. I engage in talks about them with the other staff and base my actions on their consensus, except in very specific situations. Even then, my actions will be discussed after they take place and changed, if I am in the wrong. Secondly, racism is not against the rules. Nationalism is not against the rules. Being a twat is not against the rules. Jumping on a bandwagon about the evil moderator who doesn't do her job and introduces her ego when you envision she is a an evil dictator pissing everyone off all by herself is not against the rules, either. If you don't like that we allow opinions that differ from yours, that is sand in your diaper. It's not my fucking problem.

Even if the thread creator was wrong did that give you licence to ignore an issue that was clearly present as well as any evidence in the form of posts pertaining to it?

A. I have absolutely every right to ignore anything that I want. I am not your employee. Furthermore, you assuming that I ignore things is rather rich, given a private move on my part that occurred not long before said thread was posted. B. That thread was not evidence. That thread was a bunch of people ganging up another for having an unpopular opinion.

Yet in this instance you were very quick to condemn. What made this guy so much worse?[/i]

Again, assumption. That thread was going for hours, as was a conversation about it between staff, before I said a goddamn thing about it, apart from a very brief interaction about the rules. My condemnation came later.

Shell had nothing to do with this, and shame on you for thinking this is somehow about her "ego". Phil's attitude has been reported many many times, and we (note: WE, the staff) have warned him multiple times about it. He continually disregards these warnings, hence why I (note: ME, Tiberius, not Shell or anyone else) sent him to the Gauntlet.

Perhaps you should enquire about things you clearly have no idea about before making up such ridiculous accusations in a public arena?

Ironic, you obviously have no idea what I'm referencing either. Maybe you should look into it.

Yes, then he can tell you that I didn't make the decision about your boyfriend's thread, either.