[split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action

[Reforged]

Didn't get the Mehmet thread reference I take it? No-one got that? No?

Oh, I'm sorry. You mean the thread that I was not involved in in an official capacity, but in which I presented my opinion about the schoolyard behavior you and others were engaging in? That thread?

Would you care to take me step by step through what aided your decision in ignoring the constant attempts of one person to force arguements on whos the better nation and/or race on as many threads as he could in a forum concerned with matters of theism and atheism?

In what world am I the only staff member here? Firstly, I ignore none of the issues that anyone presents to the staff. I engage in talks about them with the other staff and base my actions on their consensus, except in very specific situations. Even then, my actions will be discussed after they take place and changed, if I am in the wrong. Secondly, racism is not against the rules. Nationalism is not against the rules. Being a twat is not against the rules. Jumping on a bandwagon about the evil moderator who doesn't do her job and introduces her ego when you envision she is a an evil dictator pissing everyone off all by herself is not against the rules, either. If you don't like that we allow opinions that differ from yours, that is sand in your diaper. It's not my fucking problem.

Even if the thread creator was wrong did that give you licence to ignore an issue that was clearly present as well as any evidence in the form of posts pertaining to it?

A. I have absolutely every right to ignore anything that I want. I am not your employee. Furthermore, you assuming that I ignore things is rather rich, given a private move on my part that occurred not long before said thread was posted. B. That thread was not evidence. That thread was a bunch of people ganging up another for having an unpopular opinion.

Yet in this instance you were very quick to condemn. What made this guy so much worse?[/i]

Again, assumption. That thread was going for hours, as was a conversation about it between staff, before I said a goddamn thing about it, apart from a very brief interaction about the rules. My condemnation came later.

Ironic, you obviously have no idea what I'm referencing either. Maybe you should look into it.

Yes, then he can tell you that I didn't make the decision about your boyfriend's thread, either.

School yard behavior? We were trying to get him to spit out what he wanted to say once and for all so we never had to have it spewed out onto every thread again. The fact you posted on there means you saw every link to his posts presented but failed to read them then you proceeded to put up a post without checking if the thread had a point. You're right, you're not my employee. You're a moderator. Racism may not be against the rules, nationalism may not be against the rules but I'm fairly certain turning every topic you possibly can towards those subjects is. At the very least its spam, opinions are fine as long as you don't repeat one opinion again, and again, and again every chance you get like a pokemon saying its own name. I don't know if the other moderators witnessed it or not but I know you did and I know the only thing you did was insult people trying to resolve a situation which shouldn't have made it this far. The thread was not evidence, the posts presented were.
I never claimed you were evil, in many ways I respect some of your views and your decisions but in this case you were wrong. As was anyone else who had the status to resolve this but silently didn't.
Gay jokes, typical.