(June 5, 2012 at 10:44 am)RaphielDrake Wrote:(June 5, 2012 at 10:27 am)Drich Wrote: I've done this already. I shown and you have confirmed the seperate nature of God, and verse 30 shows that the Father and the Son are one. That "one" refers to God. Even if you can not or will not comperhend the meaning of this passage, the Jews Christ was speaking to did understand Him to say that He was God, as the Father is God. Read verse 31, 32, and 33. Christ unmistakable refers to Himself as God. And the Jews wanted to stone Him for saying it because they only understood God being a single person to that point. So again if The Son is God, as the Father is God, but both have been shown to be seperate, and yet they are one as God, then God is not a persons name, but state or title.
We also know this to be true because of the words used in the greek to communicate "God" is theos:
2) the Godhead, trinity
a) God the Father, the first person in the trinity
b) Christ, the second person of the trinity
c) Holy Spirit, the third person in the trinity
The Doctrine of the Godhead is what i have broken down and explained here. In that God is a title and not a name. (It's nothing new, just an new way at looking at things)
And what I have explained here is that at no point is God as an organization ever stated or even implied. This is something you've gathered from odds and ends that you've put your own meaning behind. There is nothing substantial behind your theory no matter how much you try to claim there is. Your theory is just one of many that has scant to back it up. Stop acting like you've proven it, you haven't even proven the concept of God exists let alone your personal theory for the state in which you think God exists
Again nothing being said here is new. This is just the doctrine of the God Head explained in terms easy enough for the average person to understand. If you still do not or will not understand what is being explained their is nothing more i can do for you.