(June 5, 2012 at 4:51 pm)Drich Wrote: Maybe you should take the time to read any one or all three defination I left for one of the other posters on this page, before you dig yourself any deeper.
Understand the word "deity" is not limited by the way you have chosen to use it.
Again I have shown my work if you wish to contest what I have said show me yours.
How about clicking on any of the link you provided as to the definition of a deity. Did you even read them?
Deity = a god
3 deities = 3 gods
three = multiple
multiple = poly
3 deities = polytheism
You lose.
And STILL waiting for you to answer the other problem, how the Synoptics depict a Jesus subordinate to his father-god.
Not holding my breath...
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist