RE: The trinity
June 5, 2012 at 6:06 pm
(This post was last modified: June 5, 2012 at 6:09 pm by Drich.)
[/size]
Option B is for the word when Capatalized.
My thread my choice we are using OPTION A
Again my thread and I am telling you how to interperate the words I have used in the context in which I am using them. To which there is little to nothing you can say or do to challenge my usage of these words.
(that is why I have asked you to show your work, because you need to understand there is nothing you can do to change the nature of what I have described here. Nothing I have said is up for debate nor interpertation. I have given you a legitmate defination and the context in which it was used.)
Asked and answer one or two post down from your orginal post.
(June 5, 2012 at 5:45 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: I see you cherry pick and come up with obtuse interpretations of more books than just the Bible in order to manufacture support for your previously held convictions.I would challenge you to do the Same Option a is for the word deity
Read the whole page, found here
Option B is for the word when Capatalized.
My thread my choice we are using OPTION A
Quote:Definition of DEITYRead the defination again, Did you not see or understand the conjunction 'or' in the context of this defination? The rank OR [size=medium]Essential nature of God.
1
a : the rank or essential nature of a god : divinity
b capitalized : god 1, supreme being
[quote]Your obtuse interpretation of the cherry picked very first half of the very first definition doesn't save you. In context, the term "rank" is understood to be what we call a being that is a god, a deity. Same as "general" or "president" is a rank. If we had three persons holding the office of "president" we would still have "three presidents".
Again my thread and I am telling you how to interperate the words I have used in the context in which I am using them. To which there is little to nothing you can say or do to challenge my usage of these words.
(that is why I have asked you to show your work, because you need to understand there is nothing you can do to change the nature of what I have described here. Nothing I have said is up for debate nor interpertation. I have given you a legitmate defination and the context in which it was used.)
Quote:Any progress yet on the Synoptic verses I provided? Get back to me on that sometime, won't you?You mean the mess of miss-quotes of Isa and John?
Asked and answer one or two post down from your orginal post.