The trinity

[Drich]

Isaiah and John are not part of the Synoptic Gospels are they?

Synoptic Gospels = Mark, Matthew, Luke.
You were asked direct questions about them. Now answer me.

From post #116 in case you've forgotten in your attempts at obfuscation:
2. It can't be reconciled with the Synoptic Gospels

Do I really need to quote them again for you? In these Gospels, Jesus is separate from and subordinate to Yahweh, with a lesser body of knowledge, a subordinate will and a different frame of experience evidence by speaking to Yahweh in 2nd person and of him in 3rd person.

Tell me how "same substance god" can be reconciled with the verses I previously quoted:
Mark 15:34
Matt 24:36
Luke 22:42

I'm rest my case with our discussion on whether or not your Godcorp is a polytheistic notion. I'll leave it for the readers to judge who won that exchange.

the dishonesty is strong with this one. Lets take an honest look at post 116:

1. Sorry, it's still polytheism.

Even if three deities were a hive mind, you still have three deities. 3 = multiple = poly. Ergo polytheism.

Add as much gloss as you like.

2. It can't be reconciled with the Synoptic Gospels

Do I really need to quote them again for you? In these Gospels, Jesus is separate from and subordinate to Yahweh, with a lesser body of knowledge, a subordinate will and a different frame of experience evidence by speaking to Yahweh in 2nd person and of him in 3rd person.

I have not ever repersented "God" to be a hive mind. therefore the conclusion you made, and the effort of post 116 does not apply to my arguement in any way shape or form. Matter of fact you and your verses support God being a title and not a name. [which happens to be my arguement.]