(June 25, 2012 at 4:06 pm)Thor Wrote: Even if the Loch Ness monster is real, how does that disprove evolution?
It wouldn't prove evolution wrong per se, however it would be quite difficult to explain how such a creature exists in an isolated, niche environment. For example, it would be problematic to explain it as a descendent of plesiosaurs given the young geologic age of Loch Ness and the absence of post K-T evidence of relatives.
With that being said, there is nowhere near enough credible evidence to suggest that the LNM exists at all.
