(July 1, 2012 at 3:39 pm)Epimethean Wrote: Your argument above makes absolutely no sense. You love to talk about context-and yet, you know neither Greek nor Hebrew. You want to use parentheses to make etymological comments, and yet you don't actually understand etymology at all, which leads to to you running around from language to language throwing out wordtrout while you chant about context.

Tell yourself what you like sport, the proof is in the pud'n. You know I think you just now truly got, what i did. you thought you trumped my arguement, when you presented the non contextual greek definations. But I believe you just now realized infact my arguement was plotted a few steps ahead of your own, because it was based on the first OT Command (Hebrew 2chr33) that supported the selective contextual (greek Gal 5:22) That points to Sorcery being sorcery and not general pharmicology (as you would mislead someone to believe.) You paniced and attacked me personally rather than delve any deeper into the 'etymology' you accused me of ignoring. why? perhaps you yourself do not have any more to give on the etymology of the Contextual meaning of the words in question. Or Perhaps you are smart enought to see where this is all leading if you continue to push for an accurate exegesis of Scripture.
Eitherway.... This would be the point where I could turn things and attack you personally, but have decided not to.