(July 3, 2012 at 12:46 pm)Jeffonthenet Wrote: It suggests that when we consider God and when we consider goblins we find ourselves in a very different epistemic situation.
Not really. Both are beings of the supernatural and neither can be proven to exist.
Quote:There are things, such as I mentioned, that suggest that God cannot be written off simply apriori as if it was self-evidently a children's fable.
You ever read some of the stories in the Babble? Noah's Ark, the Garden of Eden, Samson and Delilah, Jonah and the Whale.... the thing has stuff in it that belongs in a Hans Christian Andersen book.
Quote: Darwin didn't believe in children's fables and neither did Einstein.
I would agree. So.....?
Quote:In fact, I can reason as follows,
1. Darwin and Einstein would not seriously believe a children's fable is true
2. Darwin and Einstein seriously believed God existed
3. Therefore God is not a children's fable
Even if this path of logic holds water (it doesn't) all it proves is that "God" is not a children's fairy tale. It does nothing to prove that "God" is in any way real. Just like Roman mythology is not a children's fable, but it doesn't prove that Apollo is real.
Thor Wrote:Yes, one is an obviously fictional creation of man and the other can be found in Halloween decorations.
Quote:Please show that this is the case.
I was a making a point for comedic effect. But I guess I have to explain that to you.
Science flies us to the moon and stars. Religion flies us into buildings.
God allowed 200,000 people to die in an earthquake. So what makes you think he cares about YOUR problems?
God allowed 200,000 people to die in an earthquake. So what makes you think he cares about YOUR problems?