(July 5, 2012 at 11:13 am)Jeffonthenet Wrote:(July 3, 2012 at 1:50 pm)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote: Arguments are not evidence, whelp. And the arguments you reference -- the kalam and the moral, along with hundreds of other similar abortions -- are long-debunked laughing stock. The fact that you consider them to be valid, along with the fact that you think any such arguments can replace evidence, tells us the level of self-delusion you are willing to inflict upon yourself in order to cling onto your silly superstitions.
The arguments I mentioned use evidence. It seems to me sort of like a prosecutor who argues that a person is guilty based on the evidence of the person being found with a gun, etc… I don't think they have been debunked, as you say. I believe they are still debated in professional philosophy journals.
There is a lot of shit that is discussed in philosophy journals, but that doesn't mean anything. Things like that are just arseholes jacking themselves off with their mind.
Cunt
