A good case against God

[LastPoet]

the burden of proof is rubbish!

What an ignorant thing to say
If you really think that way, I have a bridge in Brookilyn that I'll make a good price, just send me10 K dollars and its yours.

perhaps you are assuming that theists have the burden of proof just because you are atheist.

No, because you say X exists(in your case, god), its your burden to show us that X exists. I am an atheist as a conclusion from the fact that there isn't a spec of evidence for a god, not mentioning your speciphic god.

this is just assuming from a theological standpoint, you could twist that logic e.g. a person from the flat earth society might say ' i don't need to present evidence that the world is flat but you must give evidence of the world being round'. your logic is lazy. in order to prove the non-existance of god you must present your own arguments. otherwise its looks like you are just trying to cop out of an argument. come on people!

I don't make any claims, I reject the claim theists make that there is a god. There is no evidence, just woo and switching the burden to us.

Why is your god real, and not the hindu pantheon? Either you acknowledge its a matter of faith, or you will have to be dishonest enough to claim bigger knowledge than hindus, just on faith.

BTW, there is such thing as 'lazy logic'.

---

In the words of William Lane Craig : 'absence of evidence is not evidence of abscence'

Yes, but the absence of evidence don't give you the right to claim any god, and WLC is just a snake oil salesman, his favourite argument is nothing but a big non-sequitur. BTW, it wasn't WLC that coined that phrase.