A good case against God

[Thor]

ok lets do this slowly

By all means.

1. by making a claim you have the burden of proof

DING! Very good!

2. you have the option of rejecting a claim aswell

DING! You're on a roll!

3. to conclusivly reject a claim you must present reason (or proof)

BZZZZZTTT!!!

This is absolutely absurd. I claim that a six foot tall invisible rabbit lives in my house and likes to eat chocolate eggs. According to you, you must now present proof to conclusively reject my claim. Please present such proof. If you can't, you must then accept my claim as valid. Correct?

4. therefore the conclusive rejection of a claim requires the burden of proof

BZZZZZTTTT!!

Now you're at 50%. Do you agree that the burden of proof is on you to reject my invisible rabbit claim?

5. therefore the conclusive rejection of a claim is also a claim

BZZZZZZTTTT!!!

Oh, dear. Three misses in a row. Where did you learn this crap? Because my Logic 101 professor would have failed you.

do i make myself clear?

Yes, it's quite clear you have no idea how logic works.