Why do you not believe in God?

[Jeffonthenet]

Technically speaking, generalization from observation requires inductive inference, not logical inference/deduction. Inductive inference is not properly speaking a part of logic, so, no, it doesn't close the loop.

(Now whether inductive inference is reliable and under what conditions is another matter entirely.)

Do you know a lot about this? I am no philosopher, but it seems lot me that any inference requires logic, inductive or otherwise. As far as I can tell, induction only gives you data, and to arrive at any conclusions from the data you need logic.