RE: Sex vs. Christianity
July 21, 2012 at 6:46 am
(This post was last modified: July 21, 2012 at 6:49 am by Reforged.)
(July 21, 2012 at 6:42 am)catfish Wrote:(July 21, 2012 at 6:37 am)RaphielDrake Wrote: Sorry "Lot" and his daughters. Easy mistake. Lot is son of Abraham.
All the known translations of the passage are right here, they all basically say the same thing:
http://bible.cc/genesis/19-32.htm
Of course, if you knew the Bible you wouldn't of needed me to get it for you which in itself is damning testament to your lack of knowledge on it really, isn't it?
Anyway, knock yourself out. Let me know what you think. :-)
That's the verse that describes the act. I want to know where you get the notion of what God thought about the situation...
You made claims about what God supposedly condoned, defend those claims.
I never said condoned, I said he was alright with it. He must of been. After all, he supposedly sees everything and appeared to have no objection to acting where he saw fit during that period... according to the Bible anyway. He obviously didn't see fit to act in this case. Or are you saying he didn't have the power to act?
Please, explain.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
- Abdul Alhazred.