RE: Assault On Free Speech
July 31, 2012 at 11:47 am
(This post was last modified: July 31, 2012 at 11:49 am by Shell B.)
(July 31, 2012 at 3:27 am)Lion IRC Wrote: Allow me to simplify
What?
You are actually conceding that its NOT as simple as...
Hitler was a theist ---> theism is better than atheism ---> Vote Hitler (the anti-Christian anti-Jewish mass murderer)
No. I am saying that you are too stupid to grasp it if I write too many words. Until you answer the question, your dodging ass is getting ignored.
(July 31, 2012 at 3:53 am)CliveStaples Wrote:(July 30, 2012 at 11:56 pm)Shell B Wrote: That's not censorship, you dipshit. I have freedom of speech. You have freedom of speech. However, neither of us has the freedom to use someone else's words without their permission. Intellectual property law =/= censorship.
...uh, not every quotation needs to have permission. If you, say, admit to a crime, I can report that to the cops. It doesn't seem like you know the extent of intellectual property law (or privacy law, which might be applicable). Have you heard of the fair use doctrine?
Oh, how cute. You didn't read the thread, particularly the post where I said, "if it doesn't fall under fair use." I would say I'm pretty familiar with it, given that I have to deal with it on a regular basis. It seems like you should practice reading for a bit. Don't worry. I'll wait until you're done.
Quote:Just because you vote based on a single issue doesn't mean you lack observation and deduction. Perhaps after much observation and deduction, you've concluded that the best criteria to use is actually a single one.
In that case, you would be daft.