Shell B Wrote:Oh, how cute. You didn't read the thread, particularly the post where I said, "if it doesn't fall under fair use." I would say I'm pretty familiar with it, given that I have to deal with it on a regular basis. It seems like you should practice reading for a bit. Don't worry. I'll wait until you're done.
Oh, you might know the definition. You certainly don't respect the reason for having a "fair use" exception, otherwise you won't issue speech-chilling threats--but apparently, you have to "deal with" fair use on a regular basis. Should I assume your jackboot-on-the-neck approach here is typical? Not really a fan of free speech, eh?
Although I probably shouldn't challenge you, because you might direct your ire at me--and who knows what resources you have at your disposal? I don't really feel like being SWATed.
Shell B Wrote:In that case, you would be daft.
...why? Or am I supposed to take your declarations on faith? I thought you atheists were opposed to that kind of mindless kowtowing. But apparently you're also opposed to things like supporting your claims.
“The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false.”
