Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 5, 2024, 12:40 pm
Atheist Forums › Science › Life Sciences v
Women and Nature

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Women and Nature
Oldandeasilyconfused Offline
Senior Member
****
Religious Views: Agnostic Atheist
Posts: 7388
Threads: 168
Joined: February 25, 2009
Reputation: 45
#19
RE: Women and Nature
August 4, 2012 at 4:07 am (This post was last modified: August 4, 2012 at 4:07 am by Oldandeasilyconfused.)
Quote:You may think I'm poo-pooing a science,

Not at all,psychology is a 'soft science' at best. At worst sheer crackpottery.

Read say Carl Jung's autobiography. I was also shocked to find out there is no empirical evidence to support Freud's model of consciousness, with its trinary system of ego,id and superego. I won't even start on some of the more popular alternative models.

I make a clear distinction between the practice of psychology and psychiatry,which has at least some empirical base.


As Herr Doktor Freud famously did NOT say (but should have)
Quote: Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar
Thinking
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Science › Life Sciences v
Women and Nature

Messages In This Thread
Women and Nature - by KichigaiNeko - August 1, 2012 at 9:02 am
RE: Women and Nature - by Ben Davis - August 1, 2012 at 9:07 am
RE: Women and Nature - by Napoléon - August 1, 2012 at 9:08 am
RE: Women and Nature - by KichigaiNeko - August 1, 2012 at 9:12 am
RE: Women and Nature - by Tiberius - August 1, 2012 at 9:09 am
RE: Women and Nature - by KichigaiNeko - August 1, 2012 at 9:11 am
RE: Women and Nature - by Tiberius - August 1, 2012 at 9:15 am
RE: Women and Nature - by KichigaiNeko - August 1, 2012 at 9:19 am
RE: Women and Nature - by Napoléon - August 1, 2012 at 9:11 am
RE: Women and Nature - by Cato - August 1, 2012 at 10:52 am
RE: Women and Nature - by KichigaiNeko - August 1, 2012 at 10:59 am
RE: Women and Nature - by Darth - August 1, 2012 at 11:10 am
RE: Women and Nature - by KichigaiNeko - August 3, 2012 at 3:18 am
RE: Women and Nature - by All Knowing Hippie - August 3, 2012 at 4:57 am
RE: Women and Nature - by KichigaiNeko - August 3, 2012 at 5:05 am
RE: Women and Nature - by All Knowing Hippie - August 3, 2012 at 5:10 am
RE: Women and Nature - by KichigaiNeko - August 3, 2012 at 5:31 am
RE: Women and Nature - by ElijahDrew - August 3, 2012 at 11:37 pm
RE: Women and Nature - by padraic - August 4, 2012 at 4:07 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How Nature was able to understand what we need. RayOfLight 30 4329 October 14, 2017 at 10:35 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  In the future men will be able to carry children just like women rado84 110 14128 October 4, 2016 at 9:12 am
Last Post: mcolafson
  On the nature, reliability and abuses of memory. Whateverist 7 1515 August 29, 2016 at 4:02 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  Sleep patterns. Nature or Nurture? ignoramus 19 2470 July 6, 2016 at 4:19 am
Last Post: Jackalope
  Men are better than women in combat SmootherPebble 61 19142 September 11, 2015 at 6:48 pm
Last Post: thehedglin
  Nature: Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Dolorian 10 4415 October 12, 2014 at 10:52 am
Last Post: Chas
  Precision in Nature: Evidence of God or Accidents? Alter2Ego 20 9235 August 13, 2013 at 9:48 am
Last Post: Something completely different
  The effect of increasing sexualization of women in the media Mystic 37 15831 June 10, 2013 at 6:59 pm
Last Post: Gilgamesh
  Raw Nature Zen Badger 12 6244 March 28, 2012 at 11:48 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  An Interesting Commentary on Gaslighting Women Shell B 26 11582 January 12, 2012 at 5:04 pm
Last Post: Shell B



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)