(August 13, 2012 at 3:42 pm)jonb Wrote: 1. Lords cricket ground is one of the venues where staff have been affected.You're correct, neither of those qualify as evidence. Personal experience is meaningless; if it were true, someone would have reported it. Are you seriously suggesting that a party like Labour or the Socialist Worker's Party wouldn't have made some fuss about this kind of thing?
2. A cousin of mine was given exactly that proposition.
This will not qualify as evidence because there is no published data that I know of, on the other hand they are in my personal experience.
Quote:As with most things, those that liked the Olympics will think it is not true those that don't like it will be inclined to take my word for it.I didn't like the Olympics and I'm not taking your word for it. Your word is not more important than evidence, and it most certainly is not more important than truth.
Quote:Who is going to investigate? Nobody that likes the british Olympic propaganda.There are quite a few political newspapers that don't like British Olympic propaganda.
Quote:It's like the story of how britain got the thing in the first place. We beat the French, it was not at all that the French decided to pull out was it?No, it was not that at all. Paris were in the running until the final vote, which was against London, and they lost. All of this is documented. Now I know why you don't seem to like evidence; you clearly prefer to make up stuff and believe that instead.
