(August 16, 2012 at 8:20 pm)Drich Wrote:Quote:I'm not trying to be trite or facetious, but it just does not make sense to me that a human sacrifice was necessary, in and of itself, to the exclusion of all other courses of action (like flying off in a fiery chariot).Don't know what you mean.
More broadly speaking, when is a human sacrifice ever needed for anything.
In order for the message that God/Jesus had suffered through being (sort of) separated to be conveyed to humanity was it necessary to physical torture and execute the human body that God/Jesus was occupying. If it was necessary, and no other course of action would have had the required result, why ? What was it about this execution that did what nothing else - for instance flying off in a fiery chariot to the sound of celestial trumpets - could do ?
I am sorry if my meaning wasn't clear before. I cannot think of a way to phrase this question in a better way than "Why was the crucifixion necessary ?".
Regards
Grimesy
Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful. — Edward Gibbon