(August 22, 2012 at 5:06 am)Tiberius Wrote: Accomplice to a burglary, not to a murder.
In any case, if you read his wiki you'll find that he has consistently denied knowing that they were going to rob someone; he was hungover and thought it was a joke.
I'm from Texas, where similar laws exist, though they are quite likely a lot more harsh. As a point of contention I have to highly disagree with the insinuation that his being hung over lead to a misunderstanding. I couldn't possibly care less if he was shit faced drunk and misunderstood. Substance use of any kind is not an excuse for bad behavior or for saying you didn't understand something.
He allowed the friend to take the vehicle after he was told that a crime would be committed, during the commission of said crime a person lost their life. He was an accomplice plainly and simply. He deserves the same sentence the rest of the people got, had he not given them the keys to his car with full knowledge that they had already said they were going to commit a crime he would never have had to worry. As it was he should have refused to give them the car and reported their mentioned illegal activity to the police. He chose to give them the keys and allow the crime to be committed. Pretty simple open and shut case in my book.
"Stop chasing your tail and relax. Jesus is watching you make shit up." Shell B to CliveStaples
(July 21, 2012 at 12:31 am)cato123 Wrote:(July 21, 2012 at 12:22 am)C.W. Sims Wrote: I for one, as a homo, must say that if he was a homo, then he had to have looked fabulous on that cross. Nearly naked, body all ripped, oh wait.... yeah, never mind. I'm gonna just stop right there before I offend anyone.
I have a certain distaste for the emoticons, and particularly despise the laughing/rolling dude when used in response to one's own statement, but.....
Holy fuck that was funny! "Nearly naked, body all ripped,....". Oh, fuck me. I'm still laughing but can no longer piss myself since I've emptied the tank.
