I agree 100%, but his behaviour is suspicious and he was told this would happen if he didnt fight the charges. he isn't fighting the charges, so it happened.
evidence against him, then he pulls out. i don't get it.
He says there is no evidence, so why pull out? surely if there is no evidence it would be open shut.
I'm gutted.
Quote:Mr Armstrong had until midnight on Thursday, August 23, to contest the evidence against him in a full evidentiary hearing with neutral arbitrators as provided by US law. However, when given the opportunity to challenge the evidence against him, and with full knowledge of the consequences, Mr Armstrong chose not to contest the fact that he engaged in doping violations from at least August 1, 1998, and participated in a conspiracy to cover up his actions.
evidence against him, then he pulls out. i don't get it.
He says there is no evidence, so why pull out? surely if there is no evidence it would be open shut.
I'm gutted.
