(August 25, 2012 at 1:31 pm)Faith No More Wrote: We need no evidence to prove there is no afterlife. Affirming that an afterlife exists holds the burden of proof, so all that is needed is to debunk any evidence put forth. Considering the only evidence is personal testimony of experiences while the brain is deprived of oxygen, there's not even that much to debunk.
Yeah, actually, afterlife gets put in the same category as the flying spaghetti monster; you can't prove it, but you can't disprove it, either. So while I'll keep an open mind about things, until I'm provided tangible evidence, I'm not going to be believing in something.
