(August 28, 2012 at 6:49 pm)Atom Wrote: A good start would be to cite credible peer reviewed historical publications describing how acceptable historical practices lead to the conclusion that Jesus was a myth. That would give us something to discuss
Can you do the same for all your claims?
It's just that I've read somewhere that "most scholars agree that jesus never existed".
So your claim that "most scholars believe that jesus was a real person" leaves me thinking that someone is wrong. Since you took the time to write all those points, maybe you have all the "credible peer reviewed historical publications" describing why should we accept those points.