RE: Debate help?!
September 3, 2012 at 1:33 am
(This post was last modified: September 3, 2012 at 1:37 am by Angrboda.)
Actually, number 1 is false, as death row appeals cost more money than simply housing the prisoner would.
As to number 3, it depends on how you measure the deterrent effect. One way, there is no evidence for deterrence, the other way appears there is. I forget, but I think the second approach is called 'econometric', but don't quote me on that.
Either way, bone up on stats for Texas. That's likely your worst case scenario. (As well as recent execution of someone widely presumed innocent, but condemned out of hand by Governor Perry.)
Oh, and this is a truism of hollywood law shows, that as a lawyer, you never ask a question that you don't already know the answer to; in debate, that translates into never advancing an argument if you don't know its counter-argument. And if your opponent introduces something you're not thoroughly familiar with, avoid or dismiss it. A general tactic gleaned from online debates, pick the few weakest points of your opponent, and make them out to be his whole case; if he lets you, he loses the strength of his argument; if he doesn't let you, he appears to be whining or badgering.