RE: "How do you explain the empty tomb?"
September 5, 2012 at 11:18 pm
(This post was last modified: September 5, 2012 at 11:25 pm by FallentoReason.)
Lion IRC Wrote:See that teaearlgreyhot ?
The other posters are doing a great job showing that if you dont actually want to contest the empty tomb evidence,
just ignore it as never having taken place. Simple.
Lazy....but simple.
EVIDENCE OF NON-GENUINE HISTORY
Well, would you look at that! EVIDENCE. These are the ones that I know of so far. Note: NONE of these are 'prophecies fulfilled' but trivial events and/or sayings by 'Jesus'.
It takes more faith to believe this is all genuine history than believing Mark never intended to write genuine history.
Your turn.
Let me give you a lead on what you need to explain to refute my post:
Why is Peter's witness account (i.e. the Gospel of Mark) indifferentiable from the OT and epistles? Do you honestly call that a 'witness account'?
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle