(September 14, 2012 at 8:51 am)Grazer501 Wrote: Dumac
Virtually no historian doubts his existence. As Graham Clark and Craig Blomberg put it; the documentary evidence is simply overwhelming. Graham Clark isn't a Christian either
Link to interview with Craig Blomberg as he answers some the questions over the evidence
https://publicchristianity.org/library/c...FMl93ldVo9
The gospel accounts are treated as historical biographies, written unprecedentedly early for documents of the time, containing eye witness accounts or other sources. Pauls letters have been dated earlier than the gospels and contain core elements of the Christian faith. Paul got these from others. There was a core of Christianity within a year or 2 of Jesus's reported death and resurrection. It was born and rose very quickly and for it to do so based on a man who never existed is unheard of in history. As C.F.D Moule puts it;
"The birth and rapid rise of Christianity remains an enigma for any historian not willing to take seriously the only explanation on offer by the church itself.
I'll come to the resurrection later.
I have no problems with the theory of evolution or the big bang theory. Neither of them disprove God in anyway as they are 2 different types of explanation. I'm not a young earth creationist btw.
You can't prove he's real or not. When are you guys going to get that. It's impossible for humans right now. You can only assume he is or it isn't. So please spare yourself the humiliation of putting up your so called evidence.
