(September 14, 2012 at 2:28 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote:....then the use of that term should be tasteless and unprofessional under any circumstance. If Schultz wanted to insult Ingrham politically, why couldn't he have used the terms 'shill' or 'drone' instead of using 'slut'? Schultz knows the stigma attached to that term. That's something you don't call women under any circumstance. To me it seems as if you're saying that although you agree the term is tasteless and unprofessional, you can see the justification of using it to describe a woman under some circumstances.(September 14, 2012 at 2:11 pm)A Theist Wrote: Sorry DP. I don't see it your way. It's never appropriate or justified to call a woman a 'slut' or a 'whore'. I was hoping that we could have at least had some common ground here and agreed that it's never appropriate under any circumstance. It was wrong for Limbaugh to use the term, 'slut' and it was wrong for Schultz to use it, especially when there's other terms he could have easily used to insult Ingrham politically.
...and once again we're not in disagreement about the use of the term. What part of "tasteless" and "unprofessional" do you not understand?
Where we disagree is you are desperately trying to conflate Schultz's tasteless and unprofessional POLITICAL insult to Ingram with Limbaugh's PERSONAL defamation of character and demands to see a sex tape.
Both are bad. Schultz was bad in a small way. Limbaugh was bad in a big way. Apples and oranges.
Apples and apples DP.
"Inside every Liberal there's a Totalitarian screaming to get out"
Quote: JohnDG...
Quote: JohnDG...
Quote:It was an awful mistake to characterize based upon religion. I should not judge any theist that way, I must remember what I said in order to change.