RE: Rush Limbaugh says the darndest things
September 14, 2012 at 7:08 pm
(This post was last modified: September 14, 2012 at 7:09 pm by DeistPaladin.)
Quote: You're confronted when someone on the left did the very thing you condemned the conservative for.
One more time...
A political attack =/= a personal defamation of character.
The Ed Schultz case you cited is an example of a potty mouth. He was unprofessional. His language was inappropriate. His choice of words was obnoxious. But there was no defamation of character.
The Limbaugh case is an example of defamation of character combined with a creepy proposition to boot.
Same word. Not the same thing. Remember, Limbaugh wasn't condemned just for using the word "slut". He was condemned for his defamation of character and his creepy proposition.
Find some other way to absolve him.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
