Worst atheistic argument?

[Edwardo Piet]

@ Padriac. Negative proof is a fallacy. You can't absolutely prove the non-existence of something. Falsifiability is different, to falsify something is not the same as to prove it absolutely doesn't exist. It is merely to show that something isn't true. It's not absolutely proving non-existence.

Ok, as for a bad argument. I agree with Sae that there is no single one worst argument, there are many terrible ones!

I happened to think of one myself when I was thinking to myself earlier. One I made up lol.

It's an argument against Christ being in any way "God" or 'the Lord Jesus Christ', so it's an argument against Christianity. Hopefully it's terrible enough. It's meant to be fucking dreadful, horrifically fallacious, and so ridiculous that it makes you say "What the fuck, that isn't even an argument!!".

Here it is:

1. Christ has no limits, or in other words he's bottomless.

2. If Christ is bottomless then Christ has no bottom.

3. Therefore he has no arse (or for you Americans, "ass").

4. Therefore he doesn't have a leg to stand on.

5. Therefore Christ lacks support.

6. ...Or in other words, Christ lacks supporting evidence, Christianity lacks evidential foundations.

7. Therefore the hypothesis of Christ being God is debunked, as is the Christian God because Christ is key to Christianity.

QED

Hope that was terrible enough.

EvF