As for pascals wager though it isn't a good reason to believe in God, dont you think it is good reason not to just sit back and not care whether there is a God or not?
This arguement is on a higher level than Pascals Wager don't yout think? I mean if you say it like this it is bad but real arguements of this type can be developed much further.
(September 23, 2009 at 9:50 pm)jpayne68177 Wrote: The argument of the universe being "too perfect to have happened by chance" imo. I see it all the time, the people that make that argument don't realize that the universe is not "fine tuned" for us, evolution has "fine tuned" us for it.
This arguement is on a higher level than Pascals Wager don't yout think? I mean if you say it like this it is bad but real arguements of this type can be developed much further.
Mark Taylor: "Religious conflict will be less a matter of struggles between belief and unbelief than of clashes between believers who make room for doubt and those who do not."
Einstein: “The most unintelligible thing about nature is that it is intelligible”
Einstein: “The most unintelligible thing about nature is that it is intelligible”
