(October 30, 2012 at 6:45 pm)Tino Wrote:(October 30, 2012 at 6:33 pm)whateverist Wrote: Right. It was for lying about having an affair. Certainly a high crime.
Wrong again. It was for lying under oath. It's called perjury.
Which in a more rational world would have been punished by congressional censure and a $500 fine.
Bush lying us into a war and torturing people on the other hand is an impeachable offense but any talk of that was dismissed as "shrill".
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
