Meh. Drich, I don't fundamentally disagree with your conclusion, I find fault with the process by which you reached that conclusion.
You will embrace or abandon, scorn or praise, any method or argument, based solely on the ad hoc justification that it agrees with your conclusions.
As an amateur philosopher who specializes in, among other things, epistemology — how we know things — I find your reasoning flawed at every turn.
A flawed method for arriving at the truth doesn't find itself at the truth when it is done.
I'd suggest you spend some time studying the soundness of your reasonings, but I know that would fall on deaf ears. You have an incurable disease: you are dumber than a post.