Fr0d0,
Hmm, well I see how he agrees with you and it makes sense to me while STILL not being a first cause argument but rather speaking to the pure actuality of God, but you STILL fail to explain how God can change his mind which was the crux of our argument. According to JP's actus purus definition, as I understand it, God is as unchanging as it gets and yet you claim he can change his mind. So, do you retract your statement or do you have an explaination for what you claim?
Rhizo
Hmm, well I see how he agrees with you and it makes sense to me while STILL not being a first cause argument but rather speaking to the pure actuality of God, but you STILL fail to explain how God can change his mind which was the crux of our argument. According to JP's actus purus definition, as I understand it, God is as unchanging as it gets and yet you claim he can change his mind. So, do you retract your statement or do you have an explaination for what you claim?
Rhizo