Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong

[Anomalocaris]

Social darwinism ultimately creates a better, stronger human race.

At the expense of all the "weaker" people's well-being huh?

In Darwinian evolution, what constitutes "better" is regional and ethereal. The traits that enables a being to better survive over here and today could just as easily doom it to certain death over there and tomorrow.

To say social darwinism will "Ultimately", as if it is a process with a predefined goal and an ability to accomplish it, lead to a "better, stronger", as if what might seem to the likes of this "Vincenzo" to be better and stronger is actually in any meaningful way better or stronger today, much less tomorrow, is pure rubbish.

Anyone sprouting such rubbish is evidently not better and stronger today, so Vincenzo should save Social Darwinism the trouble by jumping out of window now so the rest of us can be better and stronger right now.