A few months ago, when I first began to research the atheism vs. christianity debate, I googled it of course and came up with a lot christian based sites that tried to argue that christianity is true and I noticed one common yet absured argument in almost all the sites I read.
Most of them said something like just because I have not seen [insert name of historical figure here] with my own eyes does not mean that he does not exisit. Yes but there are paintings or photos of these people, actual writings and letters by these people in their own handwriting as well as eyewitness accounts of their interaction with them. And will all of that information we can accurately construct who this person was and where their place in history is. Why other dumb arguments have you come acrooss in debate or online that christians give in defense of their pretend god?
Most of them said something like just because I have not seen [insert name of historical figure here] with my own eyes does not mean that he does not exisit. Yes but there are paintings or photos of these people, actual writings and letters by these people in their own handwriting as well as eyewitness accounts of their interaction with them. And will all of that information we can accurately construct who this person was and where their place in history is. Why other dumb arguments have you come acrooss in debate or online that christians give in defense of their pretend god?
"Christianity is the most perverted system that ever shone on man" --Thomas Jefferson
