John V Wrote:It’s not magic. It’s quite objective to dislike things that make you sick.Poison makes you sick (or dead), so is it objectively wrong to poison people? What if it was Hitler? Just because the is no perfect 'works in every situation' rulebook of objectivity does not mean that we can justify things like slavery by calling morality subjective. You said that the conversation with me was more interesting, but never answered my post. You don't need to go back; you can just leave off with this one.
Also, if you are a masochist who loves being sick, then disliking things that make you sick isn't so objective anymore, no is it? How far must something be objective (also applying this to morals) before we can reasonably consider it as something more than an opinion? You have drawn that line here, so could it be done with morals too? (I think so)
