(November 20, 2012 at 5:50 pm)Shell B Wrote: No, you can't. Have of what you post is irrelevant. About a quarter of it directly contradicts what you have already said. You could knock it down by at least that much. You're wasting people's time, as is the other dude who refuses to post evidence of his claims because it's too much work to back up what you are saying.
Point out to me where I contradict myself and what is irrelevant - and if true I will accept.
The whole point of me posting links to evidence is to undermine basesless accusations such as this one:
(November 19, 2012 at 3:49 am)Tiberius Wrote: Too many long fucking posts in this thread. I'll try to be concise:
It appears that some people in this thread believe that they have the right (or at least, the government does) to control what parents teach their children. This is of course entirely based on their own preconceptions about what is real; completely ignoring the preconceptions of others. In other words, it's an undeniably selfish position to hold.
I do not base my arguments on "my perception" but on facts to which I leave links with evidence!
(November 20, 2012 at 5:50 pm)Shell B Wrote: My conclusion: You're a couple of anti-theists who have an agenda to serve. You will not see the contradictions in your posts because they do not suit your agenda to discriminate against people of various faiths.
Nope, I will gladly accept failure, if contradiction I made are pointed out to me. So please just do it! I would accept that I am wrong when it can be proven to me.
There is freedom of religion - everyone can believe what they want.
But there is science. And that field is not about belief in a religious way, and that field has the authority to determine what is science and what is not, and to give people ignorant of it the chance to pose as such in a legit way - is contraproductive.
I dont and have never discriminated anyone.
You on the other hand:
(November 20, 2012 at 5:50 pm)Shell B Wrote: Children born with developmental disorders that prevent them from working. Children born with immune system disorders that essentially keep them home or hospital bound. Children born with genetic disorders that cause them to become weaker and die over time. These children cannot integrate into society. That is not abuse. There is no reason why parents should be forced to raise their child so as to have that child fit in with society to the optimal amount. Optimal here having to be some arbitrary amount set by the overzealous lawmakers in TGAC land.
have something to justify!
(November 20, 2012 at 5:50 pm)Shell B Wrote: It's not abuse. Go out and get abused for a bit, go get preached to and then come back and tell us how they are similar and do try to stay on topic.
This is not about preaching - this is about indoctrinating a child into a intolerant worldview, by posing as a legit "scientific" institution.
