(December 10, 2012 at 7:25 am)Aractus Wrote: Not being an ex-scientologist I'd be surprised.
exactly. Because that information is private, and no matter how it could be aquired it shouldn`t be published.
Quote:I am first off disgusted by this subject because the medical condition of an individual is that individuals buisness and not in public interest. And if that information should ever be published - then it should be with her concent.
Quote:Morality and legality are two different things Germans.
They are, but I dont see how you make the connection here?
The publication of private information without the concent of the affected individuals is illegal. that is a fact.
Quote:Indeed, but you can't put an absolute lock on information - or do you want to live in a fascist society?
Godwin!
Only because I want a word in determining who can have an insight into my medical record this does not mean that I am a fashist.
Libertees have their limits. I do not have the liberty to publish private information of Individuals without their concent.
Especialy not information which could be damaging to their image or health.