(December 9, 2012 at 11:50 pm)naimless Wrote: In order to have a philosophy that does not believe in "force to limit thinking", you also need a philosophy that does, and a lot of other philosophies in-between.
Well, there are all of these.
(December 9, 2012 at 11:50 pm)naimless Wrote: I don't see how you can depict a difference between those who are free thinkers and those who are not.
A good way of depicting the difference, those that make others adhere to their doctrine by force and threat, and those that don't
(December 9, 2012 at 11:50 pm)naimless Wrote: The freedom is always relative to the non-freedom in the time and environment. No doubt in 1000 years "free thinkers" will look at definitions of free thinking in this time period as delusional.
Times change as do prospectives, so should we not report what we see?
Your argument seems to be nothing more than lets give up as we do not have all the answers. I say lets look for answers.
