(December 18, 2012 at 4:23 am)Aractus Wrote: The problem with his argument is that he approaches it as mutually exclusive. No scientific process necessitates negating the existence of God. We don't see the law of Gravity and say "the law of Gravity holds us onto the Earth and not God". We can still have gravity given to us by physics, in the same way we can have evolution also given to us by physics (by complex chemical processes governed by "laws" or rules that we do not fully understand). "Unguided" evolution does take place, that is observable, but it doesn't necessitate that we don't have a God.
I don't recall a 'god' constant or variable term in Newton's or Einstein's equations for gravity. Exactly what is your god's purpose regarding gravity?