(December 18, 2012 at 4:35 am)clemdog14 Wrote:Quote:You're really wideling it down to the point where you are portraying Dawkins as providing a hypothesis with no rational theory or evidence and making a simple choice between that or god.
Pretty much. But can one truly know that one dwells over the other with complete certainty? Even though the unguided evolution appears to more probable even though it is just as unlikely as the God scenario does not necessarily mean that it is full proof.
Yes, one can!
I am doing it right now! We have mounds of testable, observable data, evidence that allows me to do it. I have nothing, not one shred of proof that puts any god anywhere near that same vein of truth.
If you prefer to carry on eyes closed and ears plugged, by all means proceed.
