RE: The argument from morality is scary.
January 2, 2013 at 11:58 pm
(This post was last modified: January 3, 2013 at 12:01 am by Lion IRC.)
(January 2, 2013 at 8:39 pm)Brian37 Wrote: And let me take a wild guess, your version of what you think is science somehow matches up with your invisible sky daddy?Visibility depends on the tool you are using. That which is invisible to the magifying glass can be seen quite clearly by a microscope. You cant see multiverses in a pair of binoculars. Dark matter is all around us but I cant see it. :-(
If you used a fishing nett that only ever caught sharks you would conclude that there is no evidence for minnows or plankton. But invisible is NOT the same as non-existent.
(January 2, 2013 at 8:39 pm)Brian37 Wrote: How convenient.Yep. Very elegant and convenient. Think Occam. The God Conclusion has great explanatory power.
Of course you might be happy to remain ignorant of why questions but the vast majority of humans who want answers from science are searching for both the What and the Why of reality.
(January 2, 2013 at 8:39 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Science is universal. Religion is a mental crutch.You just made two truth claims using words that science cant empirically define. Science cant answer what religion is. Science cant assert its own universality.
Science arises from the minds of humans - since when are human primates universal/eternal/transcendent?
(January 2, 2013 at 8:39 pm)Brian37 Wrote: You reject all other gods besides the one you believe in and rightfully know that the ones you reject are their wishful thinking....
Nope. Thats not true. I do not reject all other theism.
![[Image: 4124173571_1b0ed73139_o.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.ethosapologetics.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F06%2F4124173571_1b0ed73139_o.jpg)