(January 3, 2013 at 1:40 pm)Mark 13:13 Wrote:(January 3, 2013 at 1:21 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Stop it, this is the same stupid tactic people use to twist the words of Hawkins and Einstein. It does not work.
It will not make virgin births real or zombie gods real. People don't walk on water and bushes don't talk. No one is going to get 72 virgins. And their is no elephant god named Ganish. There are just people like you who like the idea of a god or gods existing.
Scientifically speaking the individual atoms that make up life when separate as INDIVIDUAL ATOMS are also found in other materials. In a universe of billions of galaxies it should not shock anyone if we find some sort of other living organism that exists because of the same processes we see on earth.
We also see other suns too(those white dots are suns, people stupidly have called them stars, but they are suns). All Dawkins and Tyson are saying is that it should not shock anyone if we did find life possible elsewhere.
Don't conflate or twist their words to prop up your myth. None of us are that stupid.
I'm sorry but they are clearly saying there must be life elsewhere otherwise something stupedeously rare happened on earth and that if that were the case then the origins of life would have to be found in a "stupendeously improbable theory and implausible theory because if there was a plausible theory about the origin of life that wouldn’t be it because life would have to be everywhere." . I don't twist their words I use them exactly as spoken I just say they have other implications apart from what they were intialy used for.
Do you think I am that stupid, you must. You have a bible quote as your name so your end goal is to try to convince us that a god is possible, then you stupidly think that by using the words of atheists you can sneak your magic baby story into all this through the back door.
Drop it. If you are going to bring science into it, don't be stupid and think we haven't heard "I'm not trying to convince you of anything". If you are going to quote scientists just admit you do believe in a god and you want science to prop up your particular pet deity. Otherwise don't bring science into it. If you do, we are going to say "What does this have to do with the fact that you believe in a 2000 year old desert myth?"
"Mark 13:13" unless I am mistaken that is a bible verse isn't it?
