RE: Did Dawkins and Tyson say that and what are the implications.
January 5, 2013 at 9:34 am
(This post was last modified: January 5, 2013 at 9:35 am by Mark 13:13.)
(January 5, 2013 at 9:27 am)Rhythm Wrote: Late to the party, unavoidably detained by terrain. No, god, and specifically god - with nothing else attached, just the word floating round- would not be an improbable theory. Nor would it be an improbable, or even unfalsifiable hypothesis as stated. It doesn't meet the requirements, in the way you've presented it, for a theory, a hypothesis, any measure of probability, or any measure of falsification. As it stands it's just a word you left hanging.
It takes time to work out the rules and mechanics of any game but I think in time I may get an ace or two. Not being afraid to take on the big guy just because everyone else says it doesn't make sense and you can't succeed ,comes with being Irish.
Ta me go maith.
