RE: Burden of Proof
January 7, 2013 at 11:11 pm
(This post was last modified: January 8, 2013 at 2:27 am by Cinjin.)
(January 7, 2013 at 9:35 pm)Mark 13:13 Wrote: well to be honest some of what you described could actually be true and the debate we are having is really is it a self initiating self generating program or is there a programmer. Except the programme is not creating 2D mass less worlds with 2D avaters in simulated 3d but rather a 3D physical world in 4d simulation. I havent been keeping fully upto date with science but each time the break down the the building blocks of matter you seem to get more empty space so at the smallest building blocks is there actually any volume and if there is no volume is there any matter there ?, so in that sense we are all built from nothing. I have mentioned it before but there is the holographic theory of the universe
http://www.wired.com/underwire/2012/05/g...an-greene/
SOME of what I said?!?
It's all true. It's fact. Clearly you're going to have to do better. Since it is indeed fact and the burden of proof is on you, not me, you need to do a much better job!! These people need hard evidence and I am not responsible for supplying one tiny fraction of it.
