Re: RE: What one thing would disprove Christianity to you?
January 8, 2013 at 8:32 pm
(This post was last modified: January 8, 2013 at 8:42 pm by fr0d0.)
(January 8, 2013 at 7:30 pm)teaearlgreyhot Wrote: Angels = non-empirical. Interstellar spaceship = empirical. Why? It's a pretty simple question.
Why?! lol
42?
Dude, you presumed something we commonly define as empirical, only purely imaginary. OF COURSE what we are talking about from biblical reference is not imaginary. Loop to Ryft 's answer once more.
(January 8, 2013 at 7:30 pm)teaearlgreyhot Wrote: What then was all your talk about what is commonly accepted? Why did you reference a dictionary? What did I miss?
I'm losing patience with you now. The dictionary reference floored your accusation of fallacy. That there is no problem referring to common definitions in speech that do not then need empirical evidence to be made in that way. Of course holding a Christian world view where such concepts form ones reality don't fit with your declared world view. As Ryft is starting to explain this to you, I do not wish to confuse you further with my take. Ryft is far better at explaining himself than I am. I just wish you'd give him the opportunity to continue.
