Jesus, Least Fit Moral Judge

[FallentoReason]

Red herring. You were liberally calling everyone who dose not think as you do a Terrorist. Using that word to envoke an emotional response rather than discussing the particulars. I gave an example that not all 'terrorists' were as you were trying to protray them.

I gave you my definition of a terrorist according to a university moral ethics unit. I showed you how your comrades were classified as terrorists back in the day. Simple.

The emotions flow afterwards. I'm a little outraged by the fact that you need to justify their actions in order to keep yourself sane and still believing.

To which I demonstrated that 'terrorism' is a relitive term. One man's terorist is another revolutionary, Founding Father, trail breaker, Hero.

Killing innocent people is killing innocent people, Drich. What does one of the Ten Commandments say again??

Your whole arguement insists that your current way of life is some sort of absolute standard and all who oppose your understanding of what a soceity should be is commiting some sort of soceitial sin. What I have shown is your 'stanard' is about as vaild outside the borders of the community that embraces it, as current middle eastern social standards are to you. your tring to argue a trivial variable and do not even know it. This is why the rest of the world hates westerners. Because Who are you to say your way is the only right way?

Ah yes, moral relativism. So what are you trying to say in terms of where YOU stand? Do you believe in moral relativism and therefore the crusaders were right in killing everyone who thought differently because that was the morally right thing to be doing at that time? I ask you these questions because you seem very eager to not even discuss the crusaders. Well, tough luck. Changing the topic to moral relativism doesn't change the fact that civilians were smite in the name of your genocidal god. Please justify your sickening support of this.