Just another pathetic apologists argument read this article as a refutation to the one you posted rjh4. http://www.truthbeknown.com/pliny.htm This refers to both Pliny and Tacitus paltry reference to your Christ and it too makes some stinging points against the claim that the quote from the Annals is sufficient evidence for the existence of Christ.
All evidence for the existence of Christ outside the gospels are forgeries or later interpolations which just goes back to being later forgeries by Christian apologists. The evidence of the gospels is so distorted and inconsistent that it actually works against the existence of Christ and rather favors the argument that his story was a fabrication.
All evidence for the existence of Christ outside the gospels are forgeries or later interpolations which just goes back to being later forgeries by Christian apologists. The evidence of the gospels is so distorted and inconsistent that it actually works against the existence of Christ and rather favors the argument that his story was a fabrication.
There is nothing people will not maintain when they are slaves to superstition
http://chatpilot-godisamyth.blogspot.com/
http://chatpilot-godisamyth.blogspot.com/
