(January 15, 2013 at 6:18 am)rexbeccarox Wrote: I'm wondering why only three of those could be considered divine revelation. Is it because the authors of the other two don't claim it? What else makes the three worthy of that description?
He argued that, because the last people on the list were not actually divine figures, it would not be divine revelation. However, he's still jumping around the question like scared animal: The other 3 cases of "divine revelation" that were mentioned still stand and he wont address the argument.
